Algocracy and Capillaries of Power
A Critical Analysis of Hidden Power in Artificial Intelligence-Based Decision Making in the Public Sector
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47134/trilogi.v5i1.1699Keywords:
algocracy, capillaries of power, algorithm ethicsAbstract
Public-sector AI is often framed as a technical upgrade to governance, yet its design and deployment are saturated with power. This article develops an operational lens—the “capillaries of power”—to analyze how code, data, and algorithmic architectures shape public accountability. Using a critical thematic synthesis of recent scholarship (2022–2025), we map four recurring modalities through which power is enacted in AI governance: displacement of responsibility, epistemic opacity, embedded bias, and algorithmic surveillance. We detail the analytic workflow (from corpus selection and initial coding to inductive–deductive theme building and argumentative validation) and translate insights into actionable counter-power protocols: meaningful participation, public auditability, human oversight at decisive junctures, and risk-proportionate constraints on high-risk applications. Illustrative policy implications are drawn for Indonesia, including human-in-final-loop arrangements in social assistance targeting, public scorecards for fiscal analytics, ex-ante bias testing for AI-assisted recruitment, and moratorium-by-design for biometric surveillance in “smart city” systems. The study’s contribution is twofold: conceptually, it operationalizes a power-analytic vocabulary for AI governance; practically, it offers a minimal checklist that policy makers in developing countries can use to ensure that AI adoption strengthens—rather than weakens—democratic accountability and social justice.
Downloads
References
Alboré, N., Castelnovo, A., Valle, M. D., & Tessaro, S. (2025). A survey on human resource management under the EU AI Act: Ethical, practical, and regulatory perspectives. CEUR Workshop Proceedings.
Aldemir, C., & Uçma Uysal, T. (2025). Artificial intelligence for financial accountability and governance in the public sector: Strategic opportunities and challenges. Administrative Sciences.
Ananny, M., & Crawford, K. (2018). Seeing without knowing: Limitations of transparency in algorithmic accountability. New Media & Society, 20(3), 973–989.
Barocas, S., & Selbst, A. D. (2016). Big data’s disparate impact. California Law Review, 104(3), 671–732.
Brayne, S. (2017). Big data surveillance: The case of policing. American Sociological Review, 82(5), 977–1008.
Cacciamani, G. E., Chen, A., Gill, I. S., & Hung, A. J. (2024). Artificial intelligence and urology: Ethical considerations for urologists and patients. Nature Reviews Urology.
Chauhan, N., Thakur, G., Joshi, A., & Singh, Y. (2024). Ethical decision-making in artificial intelligence: Frameworks, challenges, and future directions. In Responsible AI for Digital Health and Medical Analytics. IGI Global.
Chouldechova, A. (2017). Fair prediction with disparate impact. Big Data, 5(2), 153–163.
Daidai, F., & Tamnine, L. (2023). Artificial intelligence and corporate governance. CEUR Workshop Proceedings.
Doshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2017). Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv preprint, arXiv:1702.08608. https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.08608
Ferguson, A. G. (2017). Policing predictive policing. Washington University Law Review, 94(5), 1109–1189.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Vintage.
Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality, Vol. 1: An introduction. Pantheon Books.
Guan, H., Dong, L., & Zhao, A. (2022). Ethical risk factors and mechanisms in artificial intelligence decision making. Behavioral Sciences, 12(3), 91.
Green, B., & Chen, Y. (2019). The principles and limits of algorithm-in-the-loop decision making. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT*) (pp. 1–10). ACM.
Hardt, M., Price, E., & Srebro, N. (2016). Equality of opportunity in supervised learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (pp. 3315–3323).
Indonesia. (2008). Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2008 tentang Keterbukaan Informasi Publik.
Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik.
Indonesia. (2013). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 76 Tahun 2013 tentang Pengelolaan Pengaduan Pelayanan Publik.
Indonesia. (2014). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 29 Tahun 2014 tentang Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (SAKIP).
Indonesia. (2018). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 95 Tahun 2018 tentang Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik (SPBE).
Indonesia. (2019). Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 70 Tahun 2019 tentang Sistem Informasi Pemerintahan Daerah (SIPD).
Indonesia. (2019). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 39 Tahun 2019 tentang Satu Data Indonesia.
Indonesia. (2020). Peraturan Menteri PANRB Nomor 46 Tahun 2020 tentang Roadmap Pengembangan SP4N-LAPOR! 2020–2024.
Indonesia. (2021). Peraturan Menteri PANRB Nomor 88 Tahun 2021 tentang Evaluasi Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah.
Indonesia. (2021). Peraturan Menteri Sosial Nomor 3 Tahun 2021 tentang Pengelolaan Data Terpadu Kesejahteraan Sosial (DTKS).
Indonesia. (2022). Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 tentang Pelindungan Data Pribadi.
Janssen, M., & van den Hoven, J. (2015). Big and open linked data (BOLD) in government: Issues and challenges. Government Information Quarterly, 32(1), 92–98.
Kalkan, G. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence on corporate governance. Journal of Corporate Finance Research.
Kleinberg, J., Mullainathan, S., & Raghavan, M. (2017). Inherent trade-offs in the fair determination of risk scores. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (EC) (pp. 43–52).
Kroll, J. A., Huey, J., Barocas, S., Felten, E., Reidenberg, J., Robinson, D., & Yu, H. (2017). Accountable algorithms. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 165(3), 633–705.
Lee, L. A., Duraković, B., & Yeralan, S. (2025). AI ethics: Contextual frameworks and domain-specific concerns. Heritage and Sustainable Development, 7(1), 34–49.
Mantelero, A. (2018). AI and the protection of fundamental rights in public services. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(2), 216–228.
Mitchell, M., Wu, S., Zaldivar, A., Barnes, P., Vasserman, L., Hutchinson, B., Spitzer, E., Raji, I. D., & Gebru, T. (2019). Model cards for model reporting. In Proceedings of FAT* (pp. 220–229). ACM.
Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1–21.
Muhammady, I. G. E. (2024). The hidden capillaries of power: A critical discourse approach to health governance (Doctoral dissertation). Universitas Airlangga.
Panduro-Ramirez, J., Damodaraswamy, A., Gehlot, A., & Alazzam, M. B. (2023). Exploring the technological barriers of AI in management decision making. In Proceedings of ICACITE 2023. IEEE.
Prorok, M., & Takacs, I. (2023). Legal and moral issues related to artificial intelligence technology in business. In Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics (SISY). IEEE.
Raji, I. D., Smart, A., White, R. N., Mitchell, M., Gebru, T., Hutchinson, B., Smith-Loud, J., Theron, D., & Barnes, P. (2020). Closing the AI accountability gap: Defining, evaluating, and documenting AI systems. In Proceedings of FAT* (pp. 1–12). ACM.
Ricciardi Celsi, L., & Zomaya, A. Y. (2025). Perspectives on managing AI ethics in the digital age. Information (Switzerland), 16(2), 112.
Veale, M., & Edwards, L. (2018). Clarity, surprises, and further questions in the right to explanation. International Data Privacy Law, 7(2), 76–99.
Wirtz, B. W., & Müller, W. M. (2019). An integrated artificial intelligence framework for public sector applications. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 101–116.
Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., Choenni, S., Meijer, R., & Alibaks, R. S. (2014). Socio-technical impediments of open data. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 10–29.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Iffan Muhammady, Haressa Rizkika (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
